Yes, I was informed that that's how they were spelled in the spec, so that's why I reverted the changes. - Chris
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Mathieson Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 10:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40275: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-rlc.c On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: aspell and my own spelling preferences do not always agree with the spelling variations used by folks across the pond. Revert a couple of spelling changes. Probably they should be whatever is in the spec (3GPP TS 25.322). Martin --
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email. Thank you.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
