*My* intent was to revert back out my change to go back to what Joerg
had intended in r34356. That revision says the intent was "to increase
common source code coverage".
I think I had also see some comments (r28285, for example) about
wanting/trying to get the AirPcap GUI working on Linux. I don't know
much more than that since I don't have one of the devices to play with.
Joerg?
Michael Tuexen wrote:
What is the reason to use Airpcap by default?
It is (as far as I know) only supported on Windows platforms, when having some
software installed. So why compile the stuff on non windows platforms?
Best regards
Michael
On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:37 AM, [email protected] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=41790
User: morriss
Date: 2012/03/26 07:37 PM
Log:
Revert r37423: the intent of r34356 was to enable Airpcap by default, it just
didn't work as intended.
Then make it so we build with Airpcap by default.
This should hopefully be the end of
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4879
Directory: /trunk/
Changes Path Action
+7 -1 configure.in Modified
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
