On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:53:23PM -0400, Maynard, Chris wrote: > Was it the intention to call the function, protoo_strlcpy(), or is that a > typo and it should be renamed to proto_strlcpy()?
I did it on purpose, to make commit looks nicer: (int)g_strlcpy protoo_strlcpy Still it's workaround. Ultimately I hope to remove this function. I just need to find some motivation and guard all g_strlcpy(), g_snprintf() with offset_[er] < size. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
