Hi Alexis, Out of curiosity - whilst we're thinking of absorbing externally-developed dissectors, do you think that investigating http://code.google.com/p/wireshark-nfc/ (which is currently being developed by Google - and I don't know what their plans for upstreaming are), and https://git.ring0.de/isi-wireshark-plugin/ (has multiple contributors, including myself) would be a good idea?
Thanks, Tyson. 2012/6/1 Alexis La Goutte <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I hope to include 2 new dissectors before the 1.8 release. > > - WSE Remote Ethernet protocol ( > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7260 ) > - SPDY dissector ( http://code.google.com/p/spdyshark/ ) > > This dissector has actually "plugin" dissector. > It makes sense to include in trunk in plugin form or i will include in > build-in dissector ? > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > -- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | 00447934365844
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
