... which is not to say that other new features aren't equally cool - it just so happens that a colleague of mine wanted to do this type of filtering recently and couldn't ... but now he can and it greatly simplifies his work.
- Chris ________________________________________ From: Maynard, Chris Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 9:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Wireshark-commits] rev 43069: /trunk/epan/dfilter/ /trunk/epan/dfilter/: gencode.c semcheck.c Just wanted to say that this is a really cool new feature. Thanks for adding it! - Chris ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 10:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 43069: /trunk/epan/dfilter/ /trunk/epan/dfilter/: gencode.c semcheck.c http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=43069 User: darkjames Date: 2012/06/04 07:45 AM Log: display filter: restore comparision of fields. like: udp.srcport == udp.dstport frame.cap_len != frame.len (probably you can use it for better ones) part of bug #7263 Directory: /trunk/epan/dfilter/ Changes Path Action +1 -1 gencode.c Modified +2 -1 semcheck.c Modified CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email. Thank you. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
