Yes, the frames are displayed but but aren't dissected by the dissector. 2012/6/20 Bill Meier <[email protected]>
> On 6/20/2012 9:52 AM, Pedro Fuentes Ortega wrote: > >> . >> Hello, >> This is the my first post and do not know if is the right way to question. >> In the company I work we used two proprietary protocols to communicate, >> in a private network, diferent equipments. One protocol uses udp port >> 3500 and the other the udp 3800. I have tried to encode two dissector. >> The code that uses port 3500 works perfectly, but the other does not. I >> did the same in the two just changing the port number but nothing. The >> protocol that runs on port 3800 is registered by that I see in the list >> of protocols but does not display any information. >> Any suggestions what I might be going on. >> Sorry for my English >> >> >> > > When you say "nothing", do you mean that frames with UDP port 3800 display > but aren't dissected by your dissector ? > > ______________________________**______________________________** > _______________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: > http://www.wireshark.org/**lists/wireshark-dev<http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev> > Unsubscribe: > https://wireshark.org/mailman/**options/wireshark-dev<https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev> > > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@**wireshark.org<[email protected]> > ?subject=**unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
