Just dissector. The GUI plugins are really tied to the GUI front-ends. I suppose all plugins need a well-defined API... but my main interest is the back-end stuff.
Gilbert On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Richard Sharpe <[email protected] > wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Gilbert Ramirez <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Also on my wish list is a rigorously-defined plugin API, with its own > >> versioning, so that 3rd party plugin writers can know which versions of > >> wireshark their plugins will work with. > > > > > > This has been on my wish-list for a while now [1], so I'm very much > looking > > forward to what you come up with. Unfortunately my main development > machine > > is also Linux, so I can't help with cross-platform very much. > > Are you referring here to dissector plugins only, or GUI plugins as well? > > -- > Regards, > Richard Sharpe > (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操) > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
