On Jul 16, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> One problem with a global capture filter is, that it might apply to some >> interfaces, >> but not to all. That is why we make the capture filter a "per interface" >> setting. >> This way we can check if it makes sense (showing it with a green or red >> background). > > And if it's global, you can attempt to compile it with the link-layer header > types for all of the selected interfaces and show it with a red background if > any of those attempts fail. Hmm. Makes sense. You don't know which one fails, but at least it is an indication. Irene can take a look. I think we had this at one stage...
Best regards Michael > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
