On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Jakub Zawadzki
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:00:15AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>> The grammar is conflict free, but not necessarily complete (lacking in
>> examples and there does not seem
>> to be a spec from Microsoft :-().
>
> There's spec. In network monitor chm file there's mostly complete 'NPL
> reference',
> which I used to develop my version of parser.
OK, I have it now.
I notice some inconsistencies that suggest that case is not important.
Eg, Declaration II where they say:
StructType
Required type of structure: struct or _struct (both in bold)
But then in the example, they use:
Struct Test2
{
UINT8 a;
}
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
