On Jul 31, 2012, at 7:58 AM, [email protected] wrote: > in a Q&A question > (http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/9180/strip-off-gtp-headers), Chris > Maynard suggested to provide the caputre files that have been uploaded to > bugs.wireshark.org in a similar way as pcapr.net does.
If robots can upload captures to pcapr.net, one way to provide them in a similar way to pcapr.net is to upload the non-private ones to pcapr.net.... (If we had our own viewer, we'd presumably not include the private ones there.) I don't know whether pcapr.net accepts files that aren't in pcap (or pcap-ng?) format, however; the bug database has a number of non-pcap/non-pcap-ng captures. pcapr.net *does*, however, impose "a restriction of 4048 KB or 500 packets in the uploaded pcap", so that might not work for all the captures in the bug database. > I like the idea, as it sometimes can help to troubleshoot issues with > dissectors. Currently the capture files are available through the bugs > interface anyway, but they are not classified (what protocol is used) Presumably you mean "what protocols are used", as pcapr doesn't take captures with a *single* protocol, they tag them with all the protocols used. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
