I guess where I (and the .pl script) got tripped up was the fact that there 
were separate protocols registered and they gave the impression they were 
unique and not just "one big protocol" broken up over several files.   The 
script just generates the "questionable" filters, I was using "human judgement" 
to determine if the filters actually needed to be changed.   Looking through 
the filter names, renaming to gmr1_ccch.* seems to make more sense then 
renaming the protocol to gmr1_rr.  It was all a judgement call by me, but I'm 
happy to admit I'm wrong to someone who knows the specific protocols better.  
The overall goal is just consistency in display filter names (bug 2794), but it 
can get complicated for the .pl script when protocols are broken up over 
multiple files.



-----Original Message-----
From: Pascal Quantin <[email protected]>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Jul 31, 2012 3:07 pm
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-commits: [Wireshark-commits] rev 44161: 
/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-gmr1_bcch.c 
packet-gmr1_common.c packet-gmr1_rr.c




http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=44161

User: mmann
Date: 2012/07/31 10:19 AM

Log:
 update GMR-1 protocols display filers

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
  Changes    Path                    Action
  +67 -67    packet-gmr1_bcch.c      Modified
  +14 -14    packet-gmr1_common.c    Modified
  +100 -100  packet-gmr1_rr.c        Modified





Hi Michael,


What is the rationale for this change exactly? So as to please the check*.pl 
scripts?
For me it made sense to split big protocols in various files while still having 
a common root for filters.
Moreover the rename from gmr1.rr.* to gmr1_ccch.* does not seem valid to me as 
the corresponding fields can be received either on CCCH or DCCH channels (the 
protocol name gmr1_ccch does not seem well chosen and might be named gmr1_rr 
instead).


Regards,
Pascal.
 
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

 
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to