That certainly does look the same scenario - as the last update was 2010 can I assume that this will not be fixed any time soon?
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:10 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe you're referring to this bug: > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Powell <[email protected]> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 8:58 am > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packets in different VLANS flagged as > duplicated Packets in RTP Stream Analysis > > Hi Everyone, > > I should have noted the following: > > > - I am running Wireshark 1.8.1 (compiled from source) under CentOS 6.3. > > - Dumpcap command command line is: > > > /usr/local/bin/dumpcap -B 32 -i 2 -f vlan and (not vrrp and not udp port > 1985 and not ether host 01:00:0c:cc:cc:cc) -b files:1200 -b filesize:250000 > -b duration:900 -w /var/opt/data/captures/eth1.cap > > Thanx in advance for any guidance! > > John > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:48 AM, John Powell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I am running Dumpcap as a service. >> >> My users have told me that when they select a packet capture then select >> Telephony - RTP - Show all Streams that it indicates packets are being >> duplicated (negative packet loss). >> >> For the packets being duplicated (negative packet loss), I discovered >> that there are in fact 2 packets being seen by Wireshark with the same >> SRC/DST IP Addresses and the same ID number BUT different VLANS tags. >> >> Is this an error in Wireshark that should be fixed or is there some way >> to configure Wireshark to look at the VLAN tag as well as the ID number >> before determining a packet is duplicated? >> >> Thanx alot! >> >> John >> > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > <[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
