Hi Michael,

Thanks for the tip.

When I load up the PCAP file in Wireshark and look at Statistics Summary
there is now indication of the number of packets lost.

Could you point me to what I am doing wrong?

Thanx,

John

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Michael Tuexen <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Aug 10, 2012, at 3:14 PM, John Powell wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >       • I am running Wireshark 1.8.1 (compiled from source) under CentOS
> 6.3.
> >
> >       • I am running Dumpcap as a service.
> >
> > Dumpcap command command line is:
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/dumpcap -B 32 -i 2 -f vlan and (not vrrp and not udp port
> 1985 and not ether host 01:00:0c:cc:cc:cc) -b files:1200 -b filesize:250000
> -b duration:900 -w /var/opt/data/captures/eth1.cap
> >
> > My users have told me that when they select a packet capture then select
> Telephony - RTP - Show all Streams that it indicates packets are being lost.
> >
> > Src IP    Src port Dest IP Dest port SSRC         Payload
>  Packets Lost           Max Delta (ms)    Max Jitter (ms)    Mean Jitter
> (ms)    Pb?
> > z.z.z.z    25000    a.a.a.a 58436     0x4E5B15A3   ITU-T G.711 PCMU  828
>    58 (6.5%)      399.94    1.53    0.5    X
> > t.t.t.t    11488    u.u.u.u 40300     0x46810727   ITU-T G.711 PCMU  829
>    57 (6.4%)      400.07    2.54    0.13    X
> > v.v.v.v    2240     w.w.w.w 57836     0x375E2DB2   ITU-T G.711 PCMU  829
>    57 (6.4%)      399.99    0.18    0.1    X
> > a.a.a.a    25012    b.b.b.b 52376     0x2FF25BB2   ITU-T G.711 PCMU  829
>    57 (6.4%)      400.05    0.2    0.09    X
> >
> > I have looked at the following for determining the cause for the packet
> loss with no avail:
> >
> > #dstat -dnyc -N eth1,eth2 -C total -f 5
> > --dsk/sda-----dsk/sdb-- --net/eth1----net/eth2- ---system--
> ----total-cpu-usage----
> >  read  writ: read  writ| recv  send: recv  send| int   csw |usr sys idl
> wai hiq siq
> >   43k 3586k:2090B 1549k|   0     0 :   0     0 |9212    17k|  0   1  97
>   2   0   0
> >   30k   26k:   0    15M|  11M    0 :5054k    0 |  27k   47k|  6   2  88
>   4   0   0
> >    0     0 :   0    17M|  11M    0 :5154k    0 |  27k   51k|  4   2  91
>   3   0   0
> >
> > # ethtool -S eth1
> > NIC statistics:
> >      rx_packets: 8993763019
> >      tx_packets: 48
> >      rx_bytes: 1966538225542
> >      tx_bytes: 8503
> >      rx_broadcast: 1123416
> >      tx_broadcast: 4
> >      rx_multicast: 84815150
> >      tx_multicast: 44
> >      rx_errors: 0
> >      tx_errors: 0
> >      tx_dropped: 0
> >      multicast: 84815150
> >      collisions: 0
> >      rx_length_errors: 0
> >      rx_over_errors: 0
> >      rx_crc_errors: 0
> >      rx_frame_errors: 0
> >      rx_no_buffer_count: 0
> >      rx_missed_errors: 0
> >      tx_aborted_errors: 0
> >      tx_carrier_errors: 0
> >      tx_fifo_errors: 0
> >      tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
> >      tx_window_errors: 0
> >      tx_abort_late_coll: 0
> >      tx_deferred_ok: 0
> >      tx_single_coll_ok: 0
> >      tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
> >      tx_timeout_count: 0
> >      tx_restart_queue: 0
> >      rx_long_length_errors: 0
> >      rx_short_length_errors: 0
> >      rx_align_errors: 0
> >      tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
> >      tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
> >      rx_flow_control_xon: 0
> >      rx_flow_control_xoff: 0
> >      tx_flow_control_xon: 0
> >      tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
> >      rx_long_byte_count: 1966538225542
> >      rx_csum_offload_good: 3144430076
> >      rx_csum_offload_errors: 1488
> >      rx_header_split: 0
> >      alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0
> >      tx_smbus: 0
> >      rx_smbus: 0
> >      dropped_smbus: 0
> >      rx_dma_failed: 0
> >      tx_dma_failed: 0
> >
> > # ethtool -S eth2
> > NIC statistics:
> >      rx_packets: 3244021783
> >      tx_packets: 50
> >      rx_bytes: 697014132296
> >      tx_bytes: 8727
> >      rx_broadcast: 5279269
> >      tx_broadcast: 4
> >      rx_multicast: 18211478
> >      tx_multicast: 46
> >      rx_errors: 0
> >      tx_errors: 0
> >      tx_dropped: 0
> >      multicast: 18211478
> >      collisions: 0
> >      rx_length_errors: 0
> >      rx_over_errors: 0
> >      rx_crc_errors: 0
> >      rx_frame_errors: 0
> >      rx_no_buffer_count: 0
> >      rx_missed_errors: 0
> >      tx_aborted_errors: 0
> >      tx_carrier_errors: 0
> >      tx_fifo_errors: 0
> >      tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
> >      tx_window_errors: 0
> >      tx_abort_late_coll: 0
> >      tx_deferred_ok: 0
> >      tx_single_coll_ok: 0
> >      tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
> >      tx_timeout_count: 0
> >      tx_restart_queue: 0
> >      rx_long_length_errors: 0
> >      rx_short_length_errors: 0
> >      rx_align_errors: 0
> >      tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
> >      tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
> >      rx_flow_control_xon: 0
> >      rx_flow_control_xoff: 0
> >      tx_flow_control_xon: 0
> >      tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
> >      rx_long_byte_count: 697014132296
> >      rx_csum_offload_good: 3110059283
> >      rx_csum_offload_errors: 0
> >      rx_header_split: 0
> >      alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0
> >      tx_smbus: 0
> >      rx_smbus: 0
> >      dropped_smbus: 0
> >      rx_dma_failed: 0
> >      tx_dma_failed: 0
> >
> >
> > I would be most greatful for any suggestions as to how to determine the
> cause of this packet loss and resolve it for my users.
> When dumpcap is terminated, it writes how man packets were dropped. This
> number is also stored in
> the capture file. So if you load the capture file in wireshark and select
> Statistics/Summary, you
> should see how many packets were dropped.
>
> Unfortunately, capinfos doesn't report the number of dropped packets (yet).
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any and all assistance!
> >
> > -John
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> >             mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to