On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Evan Huus wrote: > I'm a fan of a macro like Jakub mentioned as part of the old conversation: > > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201105/msg00205.html
...but let's have the macro report a dissector bug if it sees a null pointer. The dissector in question should probably say something other than just "(null)" if whatever routine supplied the pointer failed for some reason. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
