Hi Evan,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:06:29PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7775
> >
> > --- Comment #10 from Anatoly <[email protected]> 2012-10-08 14:58:26 EDT
> > ---
> > I've tried r45395, nothin is changed except wireshark has crashed:)
> > But I got one more probably interesting fact: r45380 (w/o your fixes) on
> > Vista
> > 32 bit - memory consumption increases slightly and sometimes it decreases,
> > but
> > the same revision of XP 32bit - it always increases by ~2MB.
>
> This appears to be an XP-specific bug if anyone still has an XP
> install to test with (I don't).
It mighe be OOM, for every packet we mmap 10MiB chunk of memory.
Which is *not* unmaped in emem_free_all() nor ep_free_pool().
(AFAIR for performance reasons)
Generally it'd be best to save somewhere mem->free_list before
1333 g_free(mem);
If it's hard to do than emem_destroy_chunk() is your friend.
[PS: I haven't test it yet, but looking at diff it makes sense,
if not please move on ;)]
Cheers,
Kuba.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
