On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have linked a tarball [2] containing the following files:
>> - wmem_allocator.h - the definition of the allocator interface
>> - wmem_allocator_glib.* - a simple implementation of the allocator
>> interface backed by g_malloc and a singly-linked list.
>
> Presumably an implementation of the allocator could, instead of calling a 
> lower-level memory allocator (malloc(), g_malloc(), etc.) for each allocation 
> call, allocate larger chunks and parcel out memory from the larger chunks (as 
> the current emem allocator does), if that ends up saving enough CPU, by 
> making fewer allocate and free calls to the underlying memory allocator, so 
> as to make it worth whatever wasted memory we have at the ends of chunks?

Absolutely: this is one of the things on my to-do list for wmem. I
haven't started it yet though. so if somebody else wants to grab it
that would be great.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to