On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jim Young <jyo...@gsu.edu> wrote:

> Hello Martin,
>
> On 11/20/12 9:12 AM, "Martin Mathieson"
> <martin.r.mathie...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >Alex, do you still see crashes when switching graph type?
> >Martin
>
> I'm not trying to answer for Alex, but I also saw the
> crashes in the tcp graphs before your most recent patches.
>
> I haven't crashed since your last patches. ;-)
>
> But I do see some inconstancies when switching between graphs.
> Especially if I have zoomed in and then zoomed out.  I've
> been using the tcptrace graph launched from new buttons
> on the TCP Conversations window (nice!)).
>
> This evening I'll take some snapshots and try to document
> what I see happening.  But it looks like when displaying the
> tcptrace style graph that the gray and blue lines do not always
> get painted.   I see this on my OSX Snow Leopard laptop with
> with both the buildbot Wireshark and locally built Wireshark.
>
> One thing I have noticed missing from the tcp graphs for quite a
> while is the display of the g->title values:
>
> > bash-3.2$ grep -n "g->title\[0\]" *
> > tcp_graph.c:3986:     g->title[0] = "Time/Sequence Graph (Stevens)";
> > tcp_graph.c:4222:     g->title[0] = "Time/Sequence Graph (tcptrace)";
> > tcp_graph.c:4527:     g->title[0] = "Throughput Graph";
> > tcp_graph.c:4560:     g->title[0] = "Round Trip Time Graph";
> > tcp_graph.c:4769:     g->title[0] = "Window Scaling Graph";
> > bash-3.2$
>
> This text used to be centered in the canvas above the graph.
> I'm not sure when g-title text stopped being displayed but perhaps
> it was when Cairo support was added.
>
> The lack of the g->title text along with the intermittent loss
> of the gray and blue lines in the tcptrace style graph had me
> thinking I was looking at the Steven's style graph.
>
> Unless you think otherwise it's probably best if I open up bug
> reports for both of these tcp graph issues so they don't get lost.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Jim Y.
>
>
>
Hi Jim,
I just checked in a change to draw the data segments *before* the ACK/SACK
elements.  I thought it already did this, but now you can see the grey
pixels even when zoomed out.
Thanks for the report, and taking care of the graph title issue!
Martin



>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to