Oh, that sounds greate. Thank you Will this change also included into 1.9? > > I'm not yet sure if this > should be backported to 1.8 yet, but in any case,
I think there is no need in backporting. It will be enough if this function will be in future versions -- With best regards Ilya 'Akhil' Shvetsov On 7 February 2013 22:14, Christopher Maynard <[email protected] > wrote: > Ilya Shvetsov <chvetsov@...> writes: > > > But I have to mention, that if i use proto_tree_set_visible, my dissector > fails to link. May be this happens because proto_tree_set_visible are not > in > export table. > > I added it to epan/libwireshark.def in trunk r47535. I'm not yet sure if > this > should be backported to 1.8 yet, but in any case, if you're compiling > Wireshark > yourself, then that's all you should need to do, I would think. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
