Coverity CID 986569 reports an unused pointer value at line 665:

      ti = proto_tree_add_item(hdr, hf_beep_cmd, tvb, offset, 3, 
ENC_NA|ENC_ASCII);

... but looking at 
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-beep.c?r1=47389&r2=47832,
 I am confused by the change made here because hf_beep_cmd is already added to 
the tree at line 616.  What happened to hf_beep_end?

I don't know, this looks wrong to me.
- Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 10:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 47832: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ 
/trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-beep.c

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=47832

User: mmann
Date: 2013/02/22 07:48 PM

Log:
 Convert proto_tree_add_text to proto_tree_add_item and expert_info.

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
  Changes    Path             Action
  +101 -185  packet-beep.c    Modified

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is 
intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it from 
your system and notify the sender by replying to this email.  Thank you.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to