Dnia 18 kwietnia 2013 17:56 Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> napisał(a): > ...except in those places where the UI *should* be different. For example, > when showing a JPEG, Wireshark doesn't have multiple items in the "packet > list" pane, because the JPEG is in, for example, a single HTTP message. > However, in Fileshark, the dissector might want to have separate items in the > list pane for different parts of the JPEG file.
Of course, yes. But some components doesn't need to be reimplemented (for example, hex browser). > > I think it would be reasonable to make it possible to use the same > > dissectors as for Wireshark > > Yes, that's a lot of the point of Fileshark. I just wanted to emphasize this. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
