I say Delete it. It is the original proof of concept hack I did before we switched to PIDL.
I abandoned this for PIDL in 2005 and should have deleted it then. On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > Is that a functional translator from some flavor of DCE RPC IDL (OSF, > Microsoft, Samba PIDL) to a Wireshark dissector? > > If the IDL is PIDL, is it better than Samba's translator, inferior to Samba's > translator, or none of the above? > > Should we be building it with the autotools and with MSVC++, or should we > leave it out of the CMake build? (I see no point in building it with some of > those but not others.) > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
