Are there plans to use the expert_modules tree added by this commit? I was looking at switching it to wmem but realized that it's never actually used for lookups...
Evan On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=49559 > > User: mmann > Date: 2013/05/24 10:59 AM > > Log: > Add expert info configuration framework. Bug 2412 > (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2412). > > Expert info "fields" can now be registered/addressed by name. Right now, > the basic framework allows expert info fields to become "display filters". > However more could be done, like user preferences overriding default severity > level, speeding up expert info dialog load time by not needing to redissect a > file, etc. > > Long term goal is to have all expert_info filterable and have the > functionality of expert_add_info_format() include the "registered index". > expert_add_info_format_text() is the workaround until all current calls to > expert_add_info_format() have been updated with either expert_add_info() or > expert_add_info_format_text(). Then the remaining > expert_add_info_format_text() will be renamed to expert_add_info_format(). > > Directory: /trunk/epan/ > Changes Path Action > +3 -1 epan.c Modified > +194 -7 expert.c Modified > +77 -0 expert.h Modified > +2 -2 packet.c Modified > +1 -1 proto.c Modified > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits > > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
