On Jul 13, 2013, at 12:45 PM, "Turney, Cal" <cal.tur...@emc.com> wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, "Turney, Cal" <cal.tur...@emc.com> wrote:
...
> It is on Ethernet jumbo-capable Intel, Broadcom, and some others. It looks
> like the original tcpdump developer hard-coded 1516 when he probably meant
> 1514.
So jumbo frames appear to be larger than the snapshot length?
> Are you saying that rather than adding an option to ignore
> snapshot_length/packet size discrepancies it might be best to not generate
> these warnings?
Yes. I.e., it might be best to just hardwire in the "ignore those
discrepancies" option.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
