On Jul 14, 2013, at 5:26 PM, "Turney, Cal" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Are you saying that rather than adding an option to ignore >>> snapshot_length/packet size discrepancies it might be best to not generate >>> these warnings? > >> Yes. I.e., it might be best to just hardwire in the "ignore those >> discrepancies" option. > > OK. I'll submit a patch that adds the option "Do NOT issue a warning if the > packet size exceeds the snapshot length in the capture header." in > Preferences>Protocols>Frame and set the default to not issue a warning > (checkmark set). If unchecked, the warning will be "pcap: <n>-byte packet > exceeds snapshot length of <n>." rather than "pcap: File has packet larger > than file's snapshot length." So, again, why bother offering the option to issue the warning at all? Why not just remove it - i.e., hardwire in the "do NOT issue a warning..." option? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
