Evan Huus <eapache@...> writes: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald@...> wrote: > > Laura Chappell and Sean Walberg recently discovered that logical OR > > takes precedence over logical AND in display filters. Is there any > > reason we shouldn't reverse this so that we match the order of > > operations elsewhere (including BPF)?
Ref: https://twitter.com/LauraChappell/status/365250041453109248/photo/1 Download book supplements (i.e., http-wiresharkorg.pcapng) from http://wiresharkbook.com/wireshark101.html > The fact they had to *discover* this is probably indicative of > something, but +1 for being consistent with the rest of the world. +1 for consistency. > > Should we add a bitwise OR as well? > > Until now I didn't even know we had bitwise AND, but I think it makes sense :) For bitwise ops, there are also ^ and ~ Then there's even other ops like *, /, %, +, and - ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
