Well, at least it seems to be running correctly with and without tree now. Part of r50895 probably fixed it by accident somehow...
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't working at all, even apart > from the weird only-one-set-of-arguments bug that we never tracked > down. I just grabbed a chunk of the menagerie and ran fuzz-test -g on > it myself and I'm finding way too many errors for this to be just me > getting lucky. > > This suggests, however, that if we were to fix it we would be flooded > in fuzz failures... > > Evan >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
