On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:47:50AM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> Is there a way to provide the "unknown string" for the val_to_str call made 
> in hf_ registration (ie some derivation of the VALS() macro)?
> There are many proto_tree_add_[u]int_format[_value] calls that are done 
> strictly to provided an "unknown string" for the val_to_str that is different 
> than the default of "Unknown". 
> If there was such a way, many of these calls could be converted to 
> proto_tree_add_item or proto_tree_add_[u]int.

> If there isn't such a thing, how easy/hard would it be to implement?

I'd suggest tweaking extended value_string API for it.

We'd need first to convert value_string to extended one, but I think
it's better than adding new field to header_field_info structure.

Regards,
Jakub.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to