On Sep 16, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Anders Broman <[email protected]> wrote:

> I got rid of getservbyport() and added reading of the local services file 
> perhaps the read should be removed again?

"Local services file" as in "/etc/services" on UN*X and its equivalent on 
Windows (C:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc\services?), or "local services file" as 
in "the services file that's distributed as part of Wireshark"?  We should 
continue to use the latter; the aforementioned "modifications for local use" 
could be made to that file as well.

> I'm also wondering if service name resolution should be defaulted to off, I'm 
> not convinced it's that useful.

Using the IANA port list is the reason why we get people asking why, for 
example, they're seeing "dssiapi" traffic on their network, just because 
something happens to be using port 1265.  (I picked that example somewhat at 
random, but we *do* get that asked at times.)

Should we, instead, look the port number up in the "tcp.port" or "udp.port" (or 
"sctp.port") dissector table and, if it finds a dissector handle, look up the 
short name of the protocol for that dissector handle and use that?  That means 
that:

        1) we're using the name Wireshark uses elsewhere for the protocol 
(e.g., "DNS" rather than "domain");

        2) if we don't have a dissector registered for that port, we don't show 
a protocol name (which is arguably a feature rather than a bug, as the traffic 
isn't necessarily for the protocol linked with the port number given in the 
IANA list, and this means that if we're not going to dissect the traffic as 
that protocol we're probably not going to claim it's that protocol, which I see 
as a Good Thing).

> If we decide to have it default off perhaps we shouldn't default to write
> User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 60000 (60000), Dst Port: 13868 (13868) but 
> rather
> User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 60000 , Dst Port: 13868

Yes, and the same applies for network addresses, if we're not already doing 
that.

(Also, should it be

        User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 60000, Dst Port: DNS (53)

rather than

        User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 60000, Dst Port: 53 (DNS)

I could see arguments in both directions.)

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to