On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:12:08AM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>
> I like the suggestion of a "_ws." prefix, but my hesitation is backwards
> compatibility. The only "not real" protocol filter I use consistently is
> "malformed" and I like that simplicity. And the other "protocols" in
> show_exception.c seem reasonable, but like you said, it starts to get ugly
> for some of the "lesser" error cases.
IMO we should not change the 1.10 code, but I don't mind breaking things
in 1.11 - we are doing that all the time. Of course it needs to be part
of the 1.12/2.0 release notes.
> Should I provide a patch here with your suggestion or log something in
> Bugzilla for people to test?
Both methods are fine with me, maybe a ml post will draw more responses.
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
