On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:29:50AM -0700, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> For me there is only one pidl and it's in the samba repository. Then
> we have a 2 big use case:
>
> * Samba
> * Wireshark
>
> By the way I take the chance of this thread to underline that it's
> very hard to get the attention of the wireshark developpers to
> actually push patches (much harder than the Samba actually ...).
Which bugnumber(s) are still open?
> By the way it would be nice if other dev in wireshark understand the
> term "autogenerated" because I spotted on the
> packet-dcerpc-frsrpc.c not less than 5 manual changes since the last
> time ronnie pushed the last version of the regenerated file:
It works quite fine with asn2wrs generated, because that generator
is in a maintained state, while it's hard to maintain the pidl dissector
in Wireshark: While samba was still maintained via svn, I used to
(every few weeks or months) sync the samba changes into Wireshark,
including the commit history. As I didn't have the disk space at that
time to keep a copy of the samba repo, I stopped doing that.
I'd like to have a current and working pidl generator in the Wireshark
sources again.
Ciao
Jörg
PS: One thing I'd like to have is to have a comment with the command
line used to generate the dissector like we do with asn2wrs.
--
Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
