On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 07:57:21AM +0000, Anders Broman wrote: > >OK, looks like I missed something: We have this kind of forward declarations > >in ~72% of the dissectors but not in the remaining ones. Maybe we should > >decide on one style and fix the remaining dissectors? > > > > I'd vote for fixing the remaining ones.
Reverted. Thanks for pointing this out! Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
