On Nov 16, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Nov 16, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Still it seems to be quite complicated ...
> 
> People must do this sort of thing - have DLLs that import stuff from other 
> DLLs - often enough on Windows to make it not *that* painful, right?

Or maybe they only rarely import *data* from DLLs, as

        1) it really *is* that painful

and

        2) code to use data from within the same DLL is more efficient than 
code to use data from another DLL, so you should do it with a function anyway.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to