Hi Chris, I already ask the question to Martin. And send a sample of ICMPv6 traffic to try :-)
Regards, On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Maynard, Chris < [email protected]> wrote: > Presumably this should be done for ICMPv6 as well? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 6:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53588: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ > /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-icmp.c > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53588 > > User: martinm > Date: 2013/11/25 11:01 PM > > Log: > When there is no ICMP reply, add a filterable field and expert info > warning > > Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ > Changes Path Action > +33 -0 packet-icmp.c Modified > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is > intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this > message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please > immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to > this email. Thank you. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
