On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:34 AM, [email protected] wrote: > I don't think a solution currently exists with the parser. > > I think you need to modify the omniorb parser (patches welcome!), either by > adding support for "additional" fields in the IDL or somehow providing a > "custom" data hook (as I don't think one is currently provided), perhaps in a > file separate from the IDL.
At least some other tools that take a protocol/interface description language and turn it into a dissector have separate "conformance" (.cnf) files to handle that; see, for example, asn2wrs and Samba's pidl. That would be my inclination, as it means that you wouldn't have to hack the IDL files (and have to maintain modified IDL files). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
