We already have ENC_ASCII, ENC_UTF8, etc. Perhaps
proto_tree_add_string should just take an encoding value instead?

On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Jakub Zawadzki
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I renamed base_display_e to field_display_e, and added new enums to 
> field_display_e,
> but I wonder if it's correct approach.
>
> For FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME we're using seperate enum
> (absolute_time_display_e), so maybe FT_STRING* should also have own enum 
> string_display_e ?
>
>
> Anyway, dissecotrs using proto_tree_add_unicode_string():
>         packet-gsm_sms.c
>         packet-etsi_card_app_toolkit.c
>         packet-rrc.c
>         packet-ptpip.c
>         packet-lte-rrc.c
>         packet-gmr1_rr.c
>         packet-ansi_637.c
>
> Should probably change it back to proto_tree_add_item/ proto_tree_add_string 
> and start using STR_UNICODE display.
> If you need some extra flag like: STR_UNICODE_DONT_ESCAPE than go on.
>
> I'll change packet-ip, packet-ipv6, packet-json.
>
>
> Kuba.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to