On Dec 7, 2013, at 7:02 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53826
>
> User: darkjames
> Date: 2013/12/07 03:02 PM
>
> Log:
> Add string encoding for ISO/IEC 8859-2 (ENC_ISO_8859_2)
Should code points in the range 0x80-0x9F map to 0x80-0x9F?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8859#Introduction
claims (without citing a reference inline) that
The ISO/IEC 8859-n encodings only contain printable characters, and
were designed to be used in conjunction with control characters mapped to the
unassigned bytes. To this end a series of encodings registered with the IANA
add the C0 control set (control characters mapped to bytes 0 to 31) from ISO
646 and the C1 control set (control characters mapped to bytes 128 to 159) from
ISO 6429, resulting in full 8-bit character maps with most, if not all, bytes
assigned. These sets have ISO-8859-n as their preferred MIME name or, in cases
where a preferred MIME name isn't specified, their canonical name. Many people
use the terms ISO/IEC 8859-n and ISO-8859-ninterchangeably. ISO/IEC 8859-11 did
not get such a charset assigned, presumably because it was almost identical to
TIS 620.
and the Unicode code points 0x0080-0x009F are used for the C1-control-set.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
