On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:20:58PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote: > Isn't UNICODE a bit to broad a name here? Wouldn't STR_UTF8 be a better > name as there are different unicode encodings around?
Well I'd rather avoid using any unicode encoding name here, because some people can think: "Hey, I'm using UTF-8, so I just put STR_UTF8 here", or "Hey, my protocol is using UCS-2, so why I need to put STR_UTF8 here?" STR_UNICODE is broad, which is good. Kuba. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
