Hi Gerald,

Although the USB CCID, and packet-rfid-* dissectors invoke others to do payload 
dissection, I believe that the unused dissector table registration code was a 
left-over from initial design attempts - so it's probably safe to remove it.

I hope that helps,

Tyson.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Combs <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:03:57 
To: Developer support list for Wireshark<[email protected]>
Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]>
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Unused dissector tables

The following dissectors create dissector tables but don't appear to use
them:

packet-aim.c
packet-fcp.c
packet-rfid-mifare.c
packet-rfid-pn532.c
packet-rsvp.c
packet-usb-ccid.c

Should the registration code be disabled or removed?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to