Thus wrote Tyson Key ([email protected]): > Hi Gerald,
> Although the USB CCID, and packet-rfid-* dissectors invoke others to do > payload dissection, I believe that the unused dissector table registration > code was a left-over from initial design attempts - so it's probably safe to > remove it. > I hope that helps, Ok, I removed the unused dissector tables in r53977. Regards, Martin > Tyson. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Combs <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected]: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:03:57 > To: Developer support list for Wireshark<[email protected]> > Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]> > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Unused dissector tables > The following dissectors create dissector tables but don't appear to use > them: > packet-aim.c > packet-fcp.c > packet-rfid-mifare.c > packet-rfid-pn532.c > packet-rsvp.c > packet-usb-ccid.c > Should the registration code be disabled or removed? > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
