Could someone please write a coding style section for the new dissectors and 
perhaps
point to the best example dissector.

The example would match the coding style and use, preferably, a majority of the 
API.

I would then code EXACTLY to that standard.

Currently, many of the dissectors I have submitted are having arbitrary white 
space/style
changes made.

I completely understand changes, for bugs, API changes, and warnings missed 
because of cross-platform
builds.

But I don't understand the need to change FROM a consistent style to some other 
style.

Michael Lum 
(michael....@starsolutions.com<mailto:michael....@starsolutions.com>) | STAR 
SOLUTIONS<http://www.starsolutions.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
4600 Jacombs Road, Richmond BC, Canada V6V 3B1 | +1.604.303.2315

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to