This was originally filed as bug 9569. The situation is sufficiently unusual that I really don't know what the best solution is, so I figured I'd ask for general comments from the list. The company who created and used the TPNCP protocol (and submitted the packet-tpncp.c dissector) wants to reuse that name for a new, different protocol and are asking us to disable the old dissector to avoid conflicts. The bug has more detail.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9569 Thoughts? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
