Thus wrote Jakub Zawadzki ([email protected]): > proto_item_fill_label() allows empty bytes:
> 5389 case FT_BYTES: > 5390 case FT_UINT_BYTES: > 5391 bytes = (guint8 *)fvalue_get(&fi->value); > 5392 label_fill(label_str, 0, hfinfo, > 5393 (bytes) ? bytes_to_str(bytes, > fvalue_length(&fi->value)) : "<MISSING>"); > 5394 break; > It'd be good to make them consistent, allow empty bytes (+1 from me) or > assert in both place. ok, I'll change this. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
