nmake (like all other make systems ??) uses relative times to determine if a rebuild is required, e.g. if the .c is newer than the .obj then compile the .c. The absolute time doesn't make any difference.
On 11 February 2014 12:15, Rahul Rohit <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > <<So you haven't managed to build vanilla Wireshark without **any** > modifications?>> > > Yes. I am using Wireshark baseline code but I am unable to make the build > . I am getting the errors that I mentioned in my last mail > > > > > > What I observed during the compilation is that at each compilation > command(nmake -f Makefile.nmake all) all the files are getting compiled > over and over again. I wonder if it has got something to do > > With the system time ? > > > > Regards > > Rahul Rohit > > > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Anders Broman > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:12 PM > > *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark > *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] error encountered during compilation on > windows > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Rahul Rohit > *Sent:* den 11 februari 2014 11:26 > *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark > *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] error encountered during compilation on > windows > > > > Hello, > > > > <<< If this is the first time you have tried to build Wireshark, then the > usual advice is to go back and read the Developers Guide again and make > sure you are following the prescribed method exactly as written because it > does work for many people.>> > > > > <No, this is not the first time, I often make builds. > > > > <<< If you have done that, or you have previously built Wireshark > successfully, is your copy of the sources modified in any way? If so can > you compile an unmodified version without the changes? >> > > > > <In all the previous cases , after getting the error when I commented > 'WS_MSVC_NORETURN'(in except.h) before 'except_throwd', 'except_throwf', > 'except_rethrow', 'except_throwf' functions it worked. > > > > > > So you haven't managed to build vanilla Wireshark without **any** > modifications? > > > > Regards > > Anders > > > > > > =============================================================================== > Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html > for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. > > =============================================================================== > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe > -- Graham Bloice Software Developer Trihedral UK Limited
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
