On a related note, it seems like Gerrit encourages more comments within its interface when discussing a bug/enhancement then doing it Bugzilla (where all outside patches used to go through). It was (is) always nice to have a "masochist" (-bugs subscriber) interject something into a bug in Bugzilla they weren't necessarily "following". Does Gerrit create the need for yet another "list" to follow to get the same information?
-----Original Message----- From: Gerald Combs <[email protected]> To: alexis.lagoutte <[email protected]>; Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 2:50 pm Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -commits emails On 2/10/14 10:41 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > > And as of this morning (or perhaps slightly earlier) I've stopped > receiving them at all...? > > Yes, i confirm too... They've been mis-sent since Thursday. (It might help if the script were running in production mode instead of test mode.) There are 21 missing commits. I'll fix the script and resend the messages shortly. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
