On Feb 18, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Dirk Jagdmann <d...@cubic.org> wrote: > I understand that there are good reasons to know about the actual length of > the > frame and the captured length. I suggest that we simply state these lengths in > the function name and *not* have an unqualified (shorter) name which will get > misinterpreted. So my suggestion for a rename would be: > tvb_actual_length() > tvb_captured_length()
How about: tvb_original_length() tvb_captured_length() I find that less confusing, because in my mind the "actual" length of the underlying buffer is the "captured" length. BTW, one benefit of your proposal to get rid of tvb_length() altogether is we'll get compilation errors if we don't fix them all, for example in future merges/cherry-picks. (ie, a good thing) -hadriel ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
