Sounds like a great idea to me. Evan
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bill Meier <wme...@newsguy.com> wrote: > It seems to me that it would be nice to be able to disable/enable specific > dissector and heuristic tables. > > For example, this would be useful when investigating tcp level issues > for which tcp payload dissection is not interesting. > > All the different protocols which run over tcp wouldn't need to be disabled > to just show the payloads as 'data" (and not show things like "malformed" > because some dissector mistakenly tries to dissect data). > > > Thoughts ? Am i missing something ? > > (This might be a nice little project fpr me to learn QT ...). > > > Bill > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe