Sorry, this was my mistake. I got it into my head that I'd landed the smb-direct dissector for some reason, when I clearly hadn't.
That kind of day, I guess. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Wireshark code review <[email protected]> wrote: > URL: > https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=75015e4351e666cdbd89e4c459aed91bc462c2cc > Submitter: Guy Harris ([email protected]) > Changed: branch: master > Repository: wireshark > > Commits: > > 75015e4 by Guy Harris ([email protected]): > > Can't register in a non-existent dissector table. > > This will have to wait until the SMB Direct dissector is actually > committed. There's no point in getting a bunch of "OOPS: dissector > table "smb_direct" doesn't exist" messages every time you run Wireshark > or TShark. > > Change-Id: I9772eb3f119822fbeaa78876570798d49bb4cab9 > Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/382 > Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <[email protected]> > > > Actions performed: > > from 1084b88 Fix indentation. > adds 75015e4 Can't register in a non-existent dissector table. > > > Summary of changes: > epan/dissectors/packet-smb.c | 1 - > epan/dissectors/packet-smb2.c | 1 - > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits > > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
