On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 21, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mar 21, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> How long does the clang code analysis buldbot >> >> You mean the "beat the living hell out of Wireshark to look for bugs in many >> different ways" buildbot? :-) > > What does it actually *do*? It looks like some of the crash bugs it submits > are GUI-specific and only occur way down the packet list, so presumably it > actually loads the fuzzed files in wireshark and scrolls down the list. Does > it also try some of the graphs/analyzers? > > I ask because I can't repo a crash with bug 9887 by just viewing it, but if I > select Telephony->Voip Calls... boom goes the dynamite. Hi,
Only fuzzing the dissector code (with tshark) there is no fuzzing (or automatic test ) for GUI (Wireshark) Alexis > > -hadriel > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
