+1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com>wrote: > Howdy, > Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua > 5.2? Right now the automated builds are getting built with 5.1. > > There's very little difference to end users (i.e., older scripts should > continue to work)... but for the C-code it's a lot more painful to have to > continue to handle both Lua versions, and it takes longer to test, fix, > etc. There's no real advantage to supporting both at this point, afaik. > There was back when Lua 5.2 was new and buggy, but 5.2 has been out since > 2011. > > -hadriel > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe > -- Kenjiro NAKAYAMA <nakayamakenj...@gmail.com> GPG Key fingerprint = ED8F 049D E67A 727D 9A44 8E25 F44B E208 C946 5EB9
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
