2014-04-14 21:09 GMT+02:00 Guy Harris <[email protected]>:
>
> On Apr 14, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Gerald Combs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> If a reviewer thinks the current patch is "a good start" for a feature
>>> (and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay to give the +2?
>>
>> I don't see why not, but he or she should probably check with the
>> submitter first.
>
> So +1 might be better - that way, the submitter can +2 the code if they deem
> it ready for prime time.
+1, giving +2 and a successful test round may trigger automatic
submitting in the future.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
